Wednesday, November 15, 2017

Common Core = Petri Dish for Radicals



When you see the term Whole Language always replace it with Progressive Education. Reading is basic to education.  As a teacher, this was where I first saw education co-opted by the radicals. Throughout this article I will quote from the Whole Language Catalog, published in 1991, written by Ken and Yetta Goodman with Lois Bird, the Bible or Manifesto, of the Progressive Left in Education.

Whole Language Catalog


 We are not just asking for a change in the teaching of reading, but a radical change in the society and political structure of schooling and society (Giroux and McLaren, 1986).”
And so it began. We all wondered why our schools produced so many illiterates. I guess it really began with John Dewey.
Or maybe Horace Mann.


“We who are engaged in the sacred cause of education are entitled to look upon all parents as having given hostages to our cause.” Enlightening, isn’t it? So, when your child enters a government school you have sacrificed your child to their cause. Think again when you hear someone espouse their “belief” in public school.

Their disciples are alive and well in the colleges of education. I will quote from their philosophers.
Let me introduce you to Paolo Freire, an obvious hero for this Leftist Movement to control our schools. He was instrumental in Nicaragua as a defrocked Marxist Jesuit priest who fomented liberation theology before being invited by Harvard to be a visiting professor. He published Pedagogy of the Oppressed in 1968. In 1979 Jimmy Carter advocated for a Cabinet level Department of Education and America gave away local control of education to the radical educators of the time in spite of a violation of the 10th Amendment that should have kept Education with the States.  This philosophy now dominates the colleges of education. Freire is known as the father of liberation pedagogy.


Did you know that when you sent your child to become a teacher? Or chose that profession yourself? Or sent a child into that school?
Paolo Freire, Freire for the Classroom: A Sourcebook for Liberatory Teaching:



This is a great discovery, education is politics! When a teacher discovers that he or she is a politician, too, the teacher has to ask, What kind of politics am I doing in the classroom? That is, in favor of whom am I being a teacher? The teacher works in favor of something and against something. Because of that, he or she will have another great question, How to be consistent in my teaching practice with my political choice? I cannot proclaim my liberating dream and in the next day be authoritarian in my relationship with the students.

Freire has been quite influential. This is a screen shot from Google on Freire and Harvard. And these are just a few.


As they reveal here ...”their Eurocentric culturally dominated curricula must be rejected as resistant to seeing schools as places for educating students to be critical citizens in a vital democratic society. On the other hand progressive views of literacy must openly acknowledge their own pedagogical practice that deepen the goals of democratic struggle and cultural justice.”


Whole Language Catalog

Now, you and I thought we were sending our children to school to learn to read, write and calculate. We wanted a cultural literacy to be shared with our children so that we might all assimilate into this wonderful America. Instead, Education was hijacked to become “Transformative Pedagogy.”


Whole Language Catalog
Time progressed and Freire became a hero of the Harvard Leftists.




Bill Gates funded Common Core. Common Core is financed with over $150 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The collaboration of the Gates Foundation and the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has been well publicized.  In addition, Gates, on behalf of his Microsoft Corporation, signed a 26-page Cooperation Agreement in 2004 between Microsoft and UNESCO to develop a “master curriculum” which included benchmarks and assessments.  The agreement stipulates that “UNESCO will explore how to facilitate content development.”

Common Core fits right in with the goals of Agenda 21 of the United Nations:




...It is also critical for achieving environmental and ethical awareness, values and attitudes, skills and behavior consistent with sustainable development and for effective public participation in decision-making. To be effective, environment and development education should deal with the dynamics of both the physical/biological and socio-economic environment and human (which may include spiritual development, should be integrated in all disciplines...

Now Bill Gates and the United Nations are who I would have chosen to determine what my child learns in school. Wouldn’t you? I am being sarcastic here.







Whose advice would Gates have sought in redesigning education?

How about Harvard?


And, of course, those involved in the Chicago Annenberg Project. The major writers of Common Core included David Coleman, known as the architect of Common Core. He is the son of the former president of Bennington College, Liz Coleman, graduate of the University of Chicago, a big proponent of big government and Marxist ideology. Coleman’s prior association with Bill Ayers, Barach Obama and Arne Duncan probably helped his appointment. Or it could be Coleman’s philosophy: “These standards are the most serious attempt this country has yet made to come to grips with those early sources of inequality.” He has no background as a teacher. He is also president of the College Board (yearly salary $550,000 total compensation $750,000) and will make changes to the SAT to make it more socially just. (This should set up red alert warning flags for Home and Christian schooled children who will need to pass these tests to get into college.)

Coleman and Zimba, co-founders of the New York based GROW network, came to Chicago to produce data studies for the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) at the time Obama was on the CAC Board brought on board by Bill Ayers and Chicago’s Superintendent of Schools, Arne Duncan--later U.S. Secretary of Education. CAC paid $2.2 million for the services of Coleman and Zimba in data studies.

And now we get back to Paulo Freire, a Harvard idol.

Freire brought great influence on Common Core Math. As you can see, “Paulo Freire’s critical education theory is “re-invented” in the context of application to teaching basic mathematics ...”




“...teaching mathematics for social justice course assisted, in part, in providing not only a new language but also a legitimization in teachers becoming critical mathematics pedagogues.”


 Is it any wonder our children are not taught to truly add, subtract, multiply or divide. That is not the purpose. They are to explicitly connect issues of social justice, not competent computational skills. We must lower the standards to produce equity, not excellence.


Now, since you can figure out where all of this came from, let’s get a bit more of the Whole Language Catalog supported with such vehement evangelistic fervor by our teachers.


The potential for equalizing and democratizing the schools leads to the issue of how whole language changes the power base of traditional schools as well as society. Paulo Freire (1970) points out that traditional approaches to learning and literacy create a group of passive objects in which knowledge is deposited, instead of a group of active subjects capable of transcending and transforming their sociopolitical reality. In a skills approach the learners, especially low-income and minority students, are treated as passive objects who aren't expected to act on their environment.




I ran for the Dothan School Board in the early nineties. It was difficult, but I finally got to read the By-Laws, something one might think is important to understand. One fact jumped out at me. Learning was to be SEQUENTIAL... building from simple to complex, from smaller to larger skills.
The Whole Language Catalog explains this below through their chart of contrasting models of education --Transmission model (Traditional Education) as contrasted to the Transactional Model (Whole Language a.k.a. Progressive/Common Core). Remember now, this is from the Whole Language Catalog. This is what they are telling you about themselves.

TRANSMISSION/TRADITIONAL
Emphasis on direct teaching, controlled by the program and secondly by the teacher. (Contemptuously referred to as sage on the stage)
Behaviorist model of learning
Learning is viewed as a matter of building from simple to complex, from smaller to larger skills
Since correctness is valued, risk-taking is discouraged/penalized
All learners are expected to master what is taught, when it is taught, thus, most children experience varying degrees of failure
Ability to reproduce or verbalize a predetermined correct response as taken as evidence of learning.

From the Whole Language Catalog
I lost. The system got the candidate elected whose campaign they ran from the central office.  Goals 2000 came about and the move to Delphi the public to consensus succeeded. Our board paid an “expert” probably about $100,000 to rewrite our bylaws. And that is when the Transactional model was adopted. It happened all around the country.

TRANSACTIONAL/PROGRESSIVE/WHOLE LANGUAGE
Emphasis on learning which is facilitated, but not directly controlled by the teacher. (Guide on the side)

Cognitive/social model of learning (e.g. Vygotsky, Halliday)
Smaller “parts” of a task are seen as more readily learned within the context of a meaningful whole.

Learning is seen as a result of complex cognitive processes that can be facilitated by teachers and enhanced by “peer interaction.

Risk-taking and hence “errors,” is seen as absolutely essential for learning.

Learners are expected to be at different stages and to develop at their own pace, in their own ways, there is no concept of “failure.”

Ability to apply knowledge and to think in novel ways is considered as evidence of learning as is the ability to use general strategies across the wide range of tasks and contexts.
____________________________________________
Well, I don’t know about you, but this makes me very nervous about the bridges they will build and the planes they will design and repair. I cannot believe that thinking people could have bought this and responded with such fervor to put this into our schools!

So, from SEQUENTIAL learning they went to THEMATIC teaching. Now, can you understand here how foundational knowledge has been lost? They will take a single topic and INTEGRATE these different subjects based on a single theme. What if they take the dropping of the bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Will they have learned what led up to that or how many lives were actually saved by that action? In taking ancient Egypt, do you think they acknowledge that Jews were slaves there and built pyramids? That slavery existed in Africa then and throughout the history of the world. Even today in parts of the world?

From the Whole Language Catalog

Integrated Curriculum and Thematic Learning are one and the same.




Just so you know --Sex Education is also INTEGRATED across the curriculum. What else might be INTEGRATED across the curriculum? Makes it hard to OPT OUT in any way, doesn’t it?



From the very beginning children are tracked on the basis of socioeconomic and cultural background. This is achieved initially by imposing expectations and criteria for the kinds of literacy experiences and abilities that will “count” as evidence for reading and writing development. The book-reading event is the most highly valued literacy experience prior school. Academically related activities and abilities, such as displaying knowledge about print letters and the alphabet are highly valued. These experiences are primarily associated with middle-class children.



Print letter and the alphabet are HIGHLY VALUED? Associated with MIDDLE CLASS children?

Therefore, I guess, Phonics must be withheld for all children to level the playing field? Make reading equitable?

The answer to that is to do away with books!

“...for a sizable percentage of the population, books are downright discriminatory.” Interesting thought to plant in a child’s brain.



All the research proves that children who are taught to read phonetically (across all socioeconomic groups) are better readers (with astronomically fewer dyslexics, by the way?). In addition, those children also score better in Math because their first introduction to school is abstract thinking. So now, we withhold direct instruction in Math!




Can you understand how anyone would think the methods below actually teach children to be proficient readers? These children would need someone to follow them around all the time to tell them what the word is with this “method”. No wonder they get frustrated. Do you see sounding out a word or breaking it into syllables as attack skills? But then, their favored reading specialist is Dr. Ken Goodman who wrote Reading a Psycholinguistic Guessing Game (1968).  Guessing seems to be their favorite method for Reading and Estimation for Math!



Is it any wonder parents must have their children remediated because of their lack of comprehension? They cannot get enough words that make sense out of a sentence by the time they get to the end of it with these attack skills to comprehend the meaning! I saw that happen over and over in my classroom!



Quite a contrast to Webster’s Blue Back Speller with which generations of immigrants and the natural born citizens of this country learned to read. You can see the difference here. Teachers taught directly the sounds of the alphabet. They did not instruct them to look at the picture (no pictures), say the beginning sound, think of a word that begins with the same letter, does that word fit? Skip over the word and go on. Go back to the beginning and start over. Then just ask for help. Of course, they don’t read those words of instruction. They have pictographs to remind them. They are going all around the country to keep from having to give the children the phonetic keys to our language.

Breaking words into syllables. No Guessing here.

And then look at the morally uplifting material the child read.

What a difference.

And here is Estimation. Are absolutes obsolete?



 The Delphi Technique was used in many places to bring groups to thinking they had developed consensus on these issues.




Is the Delphi Technique unethical? Remember reading above about Agenda 21 and effective public participation in decision making? That is where you will see the Delphi technique at play once more.

...It has evidently become popular within politics to give the impression that public input is actually having an impact on decisions when in reality, the decision has been made already, and the group is being guided, unknowingly, toward that end...”


http://www.leadershiptechniquesllc.com/is-delphi-unethical/1912/
And then we come to Co-operative/Group Learning and Peer Tutoring. After all of the above you probably understand that the purpose of this is to undermine individual rights and re-enforce group rights -- Capitalism versus the rights of the Collective. We are breeding little Socialists.
These folks are very much aware that you model behavior to mold attitudes and beliefs.


...A National Middle School Association conference promoted cooperative learning as an “essential” classroom practice because it directs competition away from individual performance and toward a group identity.

And there you have it. With Common Core we have the Standards, Curriculum and Assessments all bound together and cemented in concrete to indoctrinate and collect data cradle to grave on our children and through them each of us.





And like sheep we accept it? Why is this not like the Hunger Games with Panem demanding our sacrifice -- though they number in the millions. “...all parents as having given hostages to our cause.” They are our children!



Education


DEMONIC ROOTS TO COMMON CORE? VISIT YOUR CHILD'S THERAPEUTIC CLASSROOM.

THE GENEALOGY OF COMMON CORE: BILL GATES/UNESCO/ROBERT MULLER//ALICE BAILEY/LUCIS TRUST 

THE CHICAGO CONNECTION TO COMMON CORE

TEACHERS AS LIBERATORS PRODUCE STUDENTS AS REVOLUTIONARIES: Whole Language Live On!

Revolutionary Pedagogy: Or, so you thought reading, writing and calculating were why you sent your child to school?

Radical Possibilities

A Tale of the Last Hope for Local Control

THE FOUR PERIOD DAY: 
STUDENTS AS GUINEA PIGS AND PROFESSIONAL ADVANCEMENT FOR "INNOVATORS"
The Four Period Day: Students as Guinea Pigs and Professional advancement for "innovators"

The Tale of Last Hope for Local Control

DEMONIC ROOTS TO COMMON CORE? VISIT YOUR CHILD'S THERAPEUTIC CLASSROOM.

THE GENEALOGY OF COMMON CORE: BILL GATES/UNESCO/ROBERT MULLER//ALICE BAILEY/LUCIS TRUST 

THE CHICAGO CONNECTION TO COMMON CORE

does anybody really believe anymore? does anybody really care?https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/12/does-anybody-really-believe-anymore.html

Sounding the Alarm! Today's Therapeutic Classroom. What are you going to do about it?

Spalding Writing Road to Reading and John Winston of Parks Elementary Natchitoches, Louisiana
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/12/spalding-writing-road-to-reading-and.html

RETARDING AMERICA THE IMPRISONMENT OF POTENTIAL

NOTE FROM ROBERT SWEET OF THE NATIONAL RIGHT TO READ FOUNDATION

The DARE PROGRAM 20 years later.
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-dare-program-20-years-later-more.html

Merry Christmas! Meet Alliwishus, The Elf Mother Met at the Battle of the Bulge

My Mother. My hero who won a Battle Ribbon at the Battle of the Bulge. December 16, 1944. A SCRAPBOOK LOOK FROM JEAN BRONSON GILLIS BURSON.

LEONARD COHEN HALLELUJAH PROJECT AT BAY HIGH SCHOOL AND ESTABLISHMENT RELIGION, SECULAR HUMANISM, IN OUR SCHOOLS
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/12/leonard-cohen-hallelujah-project-at-bay.html

WHY SHOULD CONSERVATIVES, CHRISTIANS AND THE THE FAITH COMMUNITY BE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS? SUBSCRIBE TO THE PANAMA CITY NEWS HERALD AND GET WASHINGTON POST FREE

PEACE EDUCATION? CONFLICT RESOLUTION? TEACHING TOLERANCE? COMMON CORE 

TRADITIONAL OR PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION. DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? HAS POLITICS AFFECTED YOUR CHILD'S MATH EDUCATION?


RETARDING AMERICA THE IMPRISONMENT OF POTENTIAL

NOTE FROM ROBERT SWEET OF THE NATIONAL RIGHT TO READ FOUNDATION
DELPHI TECHNIQUE, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND THE EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT CONVINCED A GULLIBLE PUBLIC TO BUY INTO COMMON CORE

COMMON CORE: PORNOGRAPHY 101


MIDDLE SCHOOL AGENDA FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS A PART OF MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION

BEHAVIOR MODELS ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS

CULTURE WAR AND COMMON CORE

MATH WARS. ONCE AGAIN INTO THE FRAY

COMMON CORE MATH

SOCIAL STUDIES AND COMMON CORE

TEACHERS AS LIBERATORS PRODUCE STUDENTS AS REVOLUTIONARIES: Whole Language Live On!

RADICAL POSSIBILITIES: YOUR CHILDREN 
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/11/radical-possibilities-your-children.html

Response to AL.Com article "Alabama Superintendent Proposal to Raise Academic Standards."
SECULAR HUMANISM IS NOW THE RELIGION OF OUR SCHOOLS

COMMON CORE: THE EMPEROR IS WEARING NO CLOTHES

COMMON CORE=PETRI DISH FOR RADICALS
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2017/11/common-core-petri-dish-for-radicals.html

REVOLUTIONARY PEDAGOGY

Revolutionary Pedagogy: Or, so you thought reading, writing and calculating were why you sent your child to school?
EDUCATION TODAY:

Politics, Profits, Position, Power, and Prejudice published 1995

CAPSTONE EDUCATION (UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA) AND MY CONCERNS

CONFLICT RESOLUTION OR POLITICAL INDOCTRINATION?

DELPHI TECHNIQUE, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AND THE EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT CONVINCED THE GULLIBLE NATION TO BUY INTO COMMON CORE

WHO DO WE HOLD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE FAILURE OF OUR SCHOOLS?

PUBLIC EDUCATION SHOULD EMPOWER PARENTS

CONSPIRACY THEORIES IN EDUCATION

THE CIVIL WAR IN EDUCATION 

SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS

TAKE A KNEE





No comments:

Post a Comment

I would love to hear from you!