Pearson Publishing and Common Core

This morning (April 17, 2018) Fox and Friends interviewed a girl in the Milwaukee School System who read through a book being considered by her school system. It is of course published by Pearson.  She had the courage to point out the political bias in the book. 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/16/anti-trump-american-history-textbook-blatantly-biased-critics-say.html

This is Social Studies.
But then you can also see the undermining of Math Education. This is something I saw firsthand in my own granddaughter’s struggle at a Bay County Charter School. My daughter, a computer engineer, could not help her. 

PUBLISHERS MATTER!

I checked to see who published the mathematics book my granddaughter’s teacher used. It was published by Pearson, the largest education publishing company in the world. 

Pearson is connected to the hydra headed cabal promoting Common Core. (My own children learned Math with Saxon mathematics. One became a computer engineer, another holds a Masters in Marketing and another holds a Masters in Operations Management. So Pearson Math makes no sense to any of us.)

The Cabal begins with Bill Gates because money talks. But, is he involved with education because of altruism? Bill Gates is a Master Marketer. His first super success story was gifting computers to schools across the country. (See the movie The Pirates of Silicon Valley). Parents who wanted their children to have an edge on other children then had to buy a PC (personal computer) and the race was on. And now, as if that didn’t make him rich enough, he sees the computer taking the place of the teacher and Pearson, partnered with Gates, is along in this cabal restructuring education with e-books to profit even further. We are talking Billions to Trillions of dollars. (By the way, the license for those computers your school board just bought will be out in 3 years and they will have to update. Smart marketing. But good education?)

Pearson has bought up all of these imprints (publishing houses)

And why do we want children at computers? Because that is the most effective way to change attitudes and beliefs and collect data on how each lesson has succeeded. (Let me just mention here that some wonder if Wi-Fi waves contribute to the growing epidemic of autism. Just a caveat.)

Every keystroke provides more information to the data collectors behind the process lifted up to the cloud. (Watch the movie Snowden to see what he reveals about government data collection.) 

I venture to say this has more to do with collecting information and changing attitudes and beliefs than it does to academics.

You think that cloud is secure and your personal information isn’t collected there-- to determine the job your child will get and every other aspect of their life. Every study conducted has proven that CAI (Computer Assisted Instruction) is inferior to direct instruction in teaching academics. Traditional Sage on the Stage (the Progressives’ derogatory name for traditional teachers) instruction has been replaced by computers with teachers becoming more and more simply mere technicians with Progressive Guide on the Side instruction as full blown Common Core makes it into our schools.

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has fallen into the trap and has introduced a bill co-authored with Patty Murray to extend data collection on all citizens.

Notice the math problem?  The "old" way of answering is multiple choice which is dependent on the student knowing his/her math facts.  The common core way is language dependent and has less to do with math facts than it does with explaining how you came to the answer.  Remember, this is 3rd grade.  Note that this student prefers multiple choice because he/she can "think" about the possible answers. 

These are examples from Missouri. If you see odd questions like this brought home by your child, please email them to us at panhandleeagleforum@gmail.com.

Strangely, the Chamber of Commerce and the PTA support this! But then, one of the major goals is to level the playing field by dumbing education down to the lowest common denominator so you lift some and bring others down so that all children perform at the same level.  This school-to-work agenda provides a malleable workforce with basic skills. But not with Bill and Malinda Gates’ children because they go to a private school as do President Obama’s daughters. 

One wonders if the substantial contributions made by Gates to the Chamber has influenced their support and promotion throughout the country. Donna Garner, Texas educator and blogger writes: 

The U. S. Chamber of Commerce released its video entitled ‘it’s time for Common Core State Standards.’ What the U.S. Chamber of Commeerce does not bother to mention is that they have received a $1.38 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation--’to lead the effort to engage and educate state and local chambers to support Common Core State Standards.

What they did not include in this video is any actual peer-reviewed, replicated, independent research to prove that Common Core Standards will raise academic achievement. The reason none of this research is included is that no such research exists. The Common Core Standards are not internationally benchmarked and have no research to prove their academic excellence. They were written mainly by a handful of people, some of whom have never taught a day in their lives in K-12.

The Common Core Standards are the worst, most destructive, and most expensive education fad our country has ever seen. (Orlean Koehle, The Three Cs of Common Core)

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce video is clearly a puff piece relying upon all 7 of the oft-used propaganda techniques-bandwagon, name calling, transfer, loaded words, plain folk, glittering generalities, and testimonials.

(I guess this fits in with the UN ***Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures...to help the emergency of a single world culture...****)

4. So who wrote these standards?

The World Core Curriculum and the UNESCO agenda has already been mentioned, but Americans had to be processed to consider this an American product. 

So, who did it?

Common Core is financed with over $150 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The collaboration of the Gates Foundation and the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has been well publicized.  In addition, Gates, on behalf of his Microsoft Corporation, signed a 26-page Cooperation Agreement in 2004 between Microsoft and UNESCO to develop a “master curriculum” which included benchmarks and assessments.  The agreement stipulates that “UNESCO will explore how to facilitate content development.”

As pointed out earlier, testing is critical to seeing how effectively the curriculum has been in successfully adjusting the attitudes and beliefs of your child to fit the UN goals.

So there is the funding and the origin of this movement. But how were Americans processed to accept this? Who were the movers and shakers of this supposed move to federalize curriculum?

Ever hear of Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers? Ever hear of the SDS and the Weather Underground that bombed police buildings in San Francisco, Berkeley, Detroit, Michigan, New York City, the Pentagon, the U.S. Capitol Building and he National Guard Building in Washington from 1969 to 1970? 

Ayers, who came from a wealthy Chicago family with an influential father who got him off the hook for his crimes, became a professor of education at the University of Chicago and was elected Vice President of Curriculum studies by the American Educational Research Association. Bernadine became a lawyer and once worked with the same firm as Barack Obama. Obama worked with Ayers on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) for 8 years before he launched his senatorial campaign from the Ayers’ living room. The CAC processed $110 million ($60 million public funds) to improve Chicago schools with no discernible results.

Ayers published a radical manifesto called Prairie Fire--The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism calling for a revolution against the evil Empire of America and capitalism, which he saw as the root of all evil:

“My job is to help you succeed” in adopting common national standards” said the new U. S. Department of Education Secretary, Arne Duncan, an associate of Ayres in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) in 2009. 

He claimed that the States had initiated the process, though the 2007 non-elected commission igniting a national curriculum consisted of only 15 people, headed by two former governors funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 

The US Education Delivery Institute (USEDI) would train leaders in Common Core. Founded in May, 2010, USEDI is headed by British citizen, Sir Michael Barber, atheist and globalist, who is also Chief Education Officer for Pearson Foundation, the largest publishing company in the world. Companies that also make up the Pearson conglomerate include Scott Foresman, Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley, Allyn and Bacon, Benjamin Cummings and Longman.

The major writers of Common Core included David Coleman, known as the architect of Common Core. He is the son of the former president of Bennington College, Liz Coleman, graduate of the University of Chicago, a big proponent of big government and Marxist ideology. Coleman’s prior association with Ayers, Obama and Arne Duncan probably helped his appointment. Or it could be his philosophy: “These standards are the most serious attempt this country has yet made to come to grips with those early sources of inequality.” He has no background as a teacher. He is also president of the College Board (yearly salary $550,000 total compensation $750,000) and will make changes to the SAT to make it more socially just. (This should set up red alert warning flags for Home and Christian schooled children who will need to pass these tests to get into college.)

Susan Pimentel assisted Coleman in writing the English Language Arts Standards. Apparently she shares his disdain for literature calling it “imaginative writing.” 

Coleman’s childhood friend, Jason Zimba, teaches mathematical physics at Bennington College and like Coleman attended Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. He admitted that his creation, the Common Core math standards, would only prepare students for a minimum junior college level--not STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math). 

Coleman and Zimba, co-founders of the New York based GROW network, came to Chicago to produce data studies for the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) at the time Obama was on the CAC Board brought on board by Bill Ayers and Chicago’s Superintendent of Schools, Arne Duncan--later U.S. Secretary of Education. CAC paid $2.2 million for the services of Coleman and Zimba in data studies.

SHOULD A CENTRAL-CONTROLLED,TAX-PAYER FUNDED, ENTITY UNACCOUNTABLE TO THE PUBLIC DEFINE WHAT EVERY AMERICAN SCHOOL CHILD LEARN?

THREE FEDERAL LAWS FORBID IT! The Federal Department of Education shall not be involved in developing, supervising or controlling instructional materials or curriculum.

1. THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL ACT (1979); 

2. THE GENERAL EDUCATION PROVISIONS ACT 

3. THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY ACT (1965)

AND THE TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS OF OUR CONSTITUTION

Whatever is not written into the Constitution is reserved to the states and local control. 

“So, to get around these laws, the Federal Department Of Education (founded October 17, 1979 by President Jimmy Carter as a payoff to the National Education Association for their support) paid others to do what they are forbidden to do. But since taxpayer dollars helped pay for the meetings and bribed the State governors to sign on, does that not make Common Core federal, which is illegal? 

BE AWARE. STAND UP. TAKE CHARGE. 

It took this poster in a middle school (11-14 year olds) to wake some parents up. Sex Education is to be "INTEGRATED" into all classes. 

California Pastor Chad Vegas told a group of parents: 

It is now law in CA that your children must be taught how to have safe homosexual sex, how to obtain an abortion, and that gender does not correspond to biological sex.

California public schools are lost...your children are being indoctrinated into radical secularism. We must wake up to the reality of where our state has headed. We must prepare the church to live as sojourners in a foreign land, a land that feels more foreign by the day.

Pearson is listed on the London and New York Stock Exchange, with the Libyan Investment Authority, founded by Muammar Gaddafi’s sons, as its biggest financial contributor.

There is so much more in articles I have written on this blog. If you care read some more.

Madeleine Albright and Fascism

Does it bother you that someone can go into public service, create nothing, manufacture nothing, and catapult into the ranks of multi millionaire? Secrets, contacts, information are quite valuable. Just where are her loyalties?

Motivated by the above Facebook Post: ME: Odd isn't it? We are all good people, well-educated and thoughtful. And yet, I felt that the fascism would have come with Hillary. I support securing our borders like I do locking my doors at night. I cannot believe the venom that spews forth from a liberal media against a man who did nothing but run for president and people buy it! There was no collusion. Yet, after over a year of searching and collusion AGAINST the man, this goes on and on and on and on. We certainly see things differently! MY FRIEND: I listened to the interview - you can disagree with her, but to call it "venom spewing" is a mischaracterization. A well-educated, thoughtful response would be to point out specific points she made that you agree or disagree with. For example, fascist regimes forcibly suppress opposition, and Trump is waging a war on our free press and has threatened to lock up his political rivals. Those things are both demonstrably true - you can argue that you don't think he'll actually overstep his democratic bounds, or that if he does it's an acceptable outcome to you. We probably do see things differently, but can still have a reasonable discussion about it. But "he's not wrong, you just hate him" is not an argument, it's a temper tantrum. ----------------------------- 1.     Trump is not waging a war on the free press. The press chose sides. They voice the talking points of the Democrat Party. 98% of their coverage is negative, yet much good is happening. There IS NO COLLUSION. Unless it is that of the Deep State, the Democrat Party and the Major Media. Yet, that mantra continues.  2.     I did not say Albright was venom spewing, I said the Major Media is venom spewing, nasty talking and bullying!  3.     Hillary is a crook and should be jailed. Cecily (eldest daughter computer engineer that worked for the Navy at one time) would have been for less than what Hillary did. If she had just taken the hammer to one of her personal communication devices (and Hillary had MANY) she would have been in jail! Why does Hillary get to walk when she lied over and over and destroyed emails and devices that Congress subpoenaed? No person should be above the law! So now, why do I not respect Madeleine Albright’s conclusions regarding Trump? Albright is a part of a globalist cabal that wants to undermine our country and replace it with a North American Community without borders.

Madeleine Albright Friend on Facebook: conspiracy theory much? My response:  Conspiracies?
Organizations				Problem?
Born 1937 in Czechoslovakia, sent to the Prealpina Institut pour Jeunes Filles finishing school in Chexbres, on Lake Geneva in Switzerland.				Not a native born American. Has no natural loyalty to the United States.				See Also: http://www.southern-style.com/Education/conspiracy_of_the_left.html
Immigrated to the US in 1948 when she was 11 Attended Wellesley
Madeleine Albright is a Director on the Board of the Council of Foreign Relations.				The Council of Foreign Relations is a non-elected body of very powerful people with a globalist mindset. They believe in a world without borders. This particularly affects the US.				To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.
A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter." "Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. "Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway. The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards. The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system. Remember, these are NON ELECTED PEOPLE setting forth plans for OUR COUNTRY.  Of course, their plans did not come to pass as expected. However, if Hillary Clinton had been elected all of those plans would have come to fruition. That is why the Deep State is in such an uproar. God thwarted their intention bringing forth His man, not the one most "qualified" (in the world's eyes)  “There has never been a man or a woman—not me , not Bill, nobody—more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as president of the United States of America.” Barach Obama On July 15, 2009, Clinton spoke to the Washington DC satellite facility of the CFR where she stated: I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters. I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future." (Speech: Hillary Rodham ClintonSecretary of State, Washington, DC, July 15, 2009) Screen shot
Albright worked with  Zbigniew Kazimierz "Zbig" Brzezinski (Mika Brezinsky’s father)  on the National Security Council. Albright served in that position until the end of President Jimmy Carter's lone term.
Clinton appointed Albright to the position of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
As Secretary of State, Albright ignored requests for assistance from U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that were bombed in August 1998.  Prudence Bushnell, U.S. Ambassador to Kenya, repeatedly asked Washington for additional security at the embassy in Nairobi, including in an April 1998 letter directly to Albright						Look below at the investment in  Africa with Soros. Could that  Have influenced Albright’s  reaction /or non-reaction to the  appeals from Bushnell? I cannot help but wonder, if her net worth is only $10 million, how she was able to invest with Rothschild and Soros in a $350 million investment vehicle mentioned below.
She is a co-investor with Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, and George Soros in a $350 million investment vehicle called Helios Towers Africa, which intends to buy or build thousands of mobile phone towers in Africa.				George Soros funds Antifa and other disruptive organizations to stir up trouble to achieve his goals. Madeline Albright is his “business partner”? The Rothschilds have long been known as globalists.		Here Soros refers to his time as a Nazi confiscating the property of fellow Jews.
Albright represented the U.S. at the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong on July 1, 1997. She along with the British contingents boycotted the swearing-in ceremony of the Chinese-appointed Hong Kong Legislative Council, which replaced the elected one.				And she claims to support “democracy”
Many speculated that Albright might pursue a career in Czech politics. Václav Havel, Czech President from February 1993 to February 2003, talked openly about the possibility of Albright succeeding him				Apparently her dedication and loyalty to the United States is questionable.
Based in Qatar, Albright serves on the International Advisory Committee  Brookings Doha Center that undertakes independent, policy-oriented research on socioeconomic and geopolitical issues facing Muslim-majority states and communities, including relations with the United States.[93] The center was formally inaugurated by H. E. Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al-Thani, Prime Minister and minister of foreign affairs of Qatar, on February 17, 2008. Salman Shaikh is the Center's Director.				Quatar provides support to terrorist groups.
She founded the Albright Group, an international strategy consulting firm based in Washington, D.C				Notice Albright  sells her services to foreign nations to promote their goals in Washington.
In October 2012, Albright appeared in a video on the official Twitter feed for the Democrat party, responding to then-GOP candidate Mitt Romney's assertion that Russia was the "number-one geopolitical foe" of the United States. According to Albright, Romney's statement was proof that he had "little understanding of what was actually going on in the 21st Century [and] he is not up to date and that is a very dangerous aspect [of his candidacy]"				Mocked Mitt Romney for thinking that Russia was the “number one geopolitical foe.” I think she sings a different tune today.
Albright is chair of the advisory council for The Hague Institute for Global Justice, which was founded in 2011 in The Hague				Look at how these non-elected, elitists (who take money from foreign nations) presume to make policy decisions for the rest of us.
Honorary Chair for the World Justice Project.[105]The World Justice Projectworks to lead a global, multidisciplinary effort to strengthen the Rule of Law for the development of communities of opportunity and equity.				Once again, a non-elected official presumes to act as judge and jury for communities throughout the world!
Information above mostly from Wikipedia and review of Albright’s book .




So, just who, liberals or conservatives, are using violence to control thought and silence the other side? Conservatives are not a part of Antifa. Conservatives do not advocate thought police. I submit that fixing elections, using violence to silence free speech, and refusing to accept that laws apply to ALL OF us are much closer to Fascism than anything happening in society today!


On why parts of the world are moving toward authoritarianism

“And then the other part of this, which I think is essential, is there is some leader at the top who takes advantage of these divisions and, in fact, exacerbates them so that the societies are more and more divided and wrangled and looking for scapegoats, which is where the immigrants come in. But mostly, this is something that's created internally by massive changes in society and some of them, due to technology.”

The tech companies are of admitted liberal inclination. How ironic it is that Albright could say this with a straight face when this is EXACTLY what Hillary has done! and Albright and the Democrat Party with its identity politics continues to do!

Unlike Albright who blames Trump for the move toward authoritarianism, I see the authoritarianism within the Deep State, the FBI abuse of power, and the violent imposition of fear tactics against Conservatives by Antifa. They look down upon those who voted for Trump and dismiss their concerns as unintellectual.

Look at Venezuela today! One man, one vote, one time! Thankfully we are a Republic!

On President Trump's "America First" ideology and criticism of NATO

"I see it as the most unbelievable step backwards, because I do believe that the United States is stronger when we have friends and allies to deal with the various issues. ... As a European who has spent her life in the United States, I see the Euro-Atlantic alliance as one of the most important bulwarks of our society, so seeing this go on, I find appalling. And what is the issue — again, it's this lack of understanding of what this alliance is about. ..."

Albright admits that she sees the US role in the world through the prism of a European. She objects to Trump’s “America First” ideology because she sees the world through a globalist’s perspective. Globalists see the US as the cash cow to fund their agendas throughout the world through NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) like the United Nations. And, of course, they handle the money, award the winners and destroy the losers. 

On her belief that President Trump is "anti-democratic"

Thank God we are not a pure democracy. A pure democracy is two wolves and a chicken voting for what’s for dinner. 

Taking the Hunger Games as a metaphor for what could happen, Madeline Albright (including BFF Hillary Clinton) and her associates would be the rulers in Panem. Once they disarm the rest of us, we would be like the Districts of the Hunger Games that work to support the lifestyle of the leaders in Panem. We are not bright enough to understand what the world really requires. 

And that my friends would make us slaves. 

So, when the friend challenged me on Facebook writing: 

I listened to the interview - you can disagree with her, but to call it "venom spewing" is a mischaracterization. A well-educated, thoughtful response would be to point out specific points she made that you agree or disagree with. 

For example, fascist regimes forcibly suppress opposition, and Trump is waging a war on our free press and has threatened to lock up his political rivals. 

---------------------------------------

The points above articulate my concerns with Madeleine Albright. 

It is my belief that the Fascist regime that continues to undermine the duly elected president of the United States is the Deep State using its power to attempt to forcibly suppress opposition. This group of people has determined that they will control policy regardless of the will of the people. Read the emails Peter Strozk (FBI)  and Lisa Page (Justice Department) see if you think that might be considered a conspiracy to attempt a coup. 

While the accusation of Russian collusion was leveled at Trump, the actual collusion was by Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party that first colluded to keep Bernie Sanders from becoming the Democratic candidate for President and then to undermine Trump through a salacious and fallacious document funded by Hillary and the Democrat Party that was then "leaked to Major Media" (suspected leaker? John Brennan, former FBI chief) as well as being used to procure FISA approval to wiretapping American citizens. Lies and deceit are their methodology.

 I repeat:

1.    Trump is not waging a war on the free press. The press chose sides. They voice the talking points of the Democrat Party. 98% of their coverage is negative, yet much good is happening. There IS NO COLLUSION on Trump's part. Yet, that mantra continues as a part of the RESIST movement. Just what are they resisting?  

2.    I did not say Albright was venom spewing, I said the Major Media is venom spewing, nasty talking and bullying! 

3.    Hillary is a crook and should be jailed. Cecily (eldest daughter computer engineer that worked for the Navy at one time) would have been jailed for much less than what Hillary did. If she had just taken the hammer to just one of her personal communication devices (and Hillary had MANY that were destroyed) she would have been in jail! Why does Hillary get to walk when she lied over and over and destroyed emails and devices that Congress subpoenaed? 

Bernie Sanders didn’t have a chance! Clinton rigged the primaries. As Donna Brazille writes:

The Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC was also required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

I would submit that it is "antidemocratic" to undermine the Democrat primaries rigging the election so that only she would win. And since the election she immediately started the lies regarding collusion TO DETRACT FROM HER OWN RUSSIAN COLLUSION SELLING 20% OF SCARCE AMERICAN URANIUM TO THE RUSSIANS AND FABRICATING A DOCUMENT, PUSHING IT TO THE MEDIA AND FBI TO USE AS "EVIDENCE" FOR FISA WARRANTS TO TAP TRUMP AND ASSOCIATES. These are third world tactics and she and her associates are as guilty as sin. 

Albright said, “ There's a special place in hell for women who don't help each other!”

Many women looked at Hillary's record and concluded no person should be above the law! They chose not to be corralled like a bunch of sheep to think only feminist approved thoughts.  So, I also resent Albright's lumping all women into a group of mind controlled robots. Personally, I think there is a special place in hell for liars and cheats regardless of their gender and especially for those who rise to power denying others justice under our laws. 

Why do I not respect Madeleine Albright’s conclusions regarding Trump? Albright is a part of a globalist cabal that wants to undermine our country and replace it with a North American Community without borders. The organizations to which she belongs support my conclusions. Her support of Hillary Clinton reaffirms that evaluation. 

She considers her European roots primary. My roots go back to the 1600s. Native American roots are even further back. I am appalled with this disrespect for the most wonderful, generous country in the world and its duly elected president. I am a Deplorable who sees the good in this country and I want my grandchildren retain the right to see the positive of our land.