IG REPORT-- DEEP STATE SHIELDS AND REPRODUCES ITSELF
By the way, Christopher Wray reassigned Strzok to human resources.
1. Need retraining? According to Christopher Wray, FBI Chief. Not indictment and prosecution?
They already knowingly text on certain phone when talking about Hillary "BECAUSE IT CAN'T BE TRACED"
04/02/2016
Page – So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting, bc you feel bad that you’re gone so much but that can’t be helped right now.
Strzok – Right. But did you say anything other than work? I did, [redacted].
Page warned Strzok via text about the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state, saying in February 2016 that she “might be our next president.”
“The last thing you need [is] going in there loaded for bear,” Page continued. “You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more [DOJ] than [FBI]?”
She also warned him to go easy on his investigation because "she might be our next president."
Job security was paramount here. Not the security of our country.
Page and Strzok also discussed preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Barack Obama because he wanted “to know everything we’re doing,” she said.
NOT POLITICAL?
Everything they did was "antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice." Why are they not being prosecuted? Why did Wray move Strzok to HUMAN RESOURCES? Is Wray involved?
|
| http://www.businessinsider.com/top-fbi-investigator-peter-strzok-steps-away-from-russia-probe-2017-8 |
10/30/2016
Strzok – This is all Matt / Justice officials warned FBI that Comeys decision to update congress was not consistent with department policy - The Washington Post https://washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-officials-warned-fbi-that-comeys-decision-to-update-congress-was-not-consistent-with-department-policy(THIS ARTICLE IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE)
Page – Yeah. I saw it. Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus in the forthcoming CF article (?)
Strzok – Yep the whole tone is anti Bu (?). Just a tiny bit from is. And serves him right. He's gonna be pissed...
Not political? Remember the Hillary Email Investigation was also known as the Midyear.
And yet.....
Collusion?
President Obama was directly involved.
04/02/2016 and Strzok also discussed preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Barack Obama because he wanted “to know everything we’re doing,” she said.
Strzok – K. Rybicki just sent another version.
Page – Bill just popped his head in, hopefully to talk to him.
Strzok – Hope so. Just left Bill. Talked about the speed, the [redacted] stuff relating to the case, and what I told you about earlier.Strzok – He changed President to "another senior government official."
Why was David Axelrod involved if there was no collusion between the White House and the suppression of the impact of Hillary Clinton's emails? Notice, Axelrod is known as the chief Strategist for Barach Obama's presidential campaigns. He served as Senior Advisor during Obama's presidency.
This is just one example...
3. Rybicki changed "President" to "another senior government official."Rybicki was apparently involved in keeping President Obama clear from public notice that he was intimately involved with the Hillary Clinton investigation.
Christopher Wray nearly resigned over Rybicki. Why?
NOT POLITICAL?????
Rybick was apparently involved in keeping President Obama clear from public notice that he was intimately involved with the Hillary Clinton investigation.
Why was Christopher Wray so defensive of Rybicki?
In a statement released following reports that Wray threatened to quit over pressure to oust his senior staff, the FBI director seemed to go out of his way to assure FBI personnel that Rybicki was not being pushed out.
"Jim Rybicki notified me last month that he will be leaving the FBI to accept an opportunity in the corporate sector. While this is an exciting move for the whole Rybicki family, Jim will be dearly missed by the FBI family — and by me personally," Wray said. "His many years of dedication to the Bureau and DOJ, his level-headed judgement and earnest professionalism, and his steady good cheer have been an asset to us all and have contributed greatly to the safety and security of our nation."
Last week, Rybicki was on Capitol Hill answering questions from House Oversight Committee and Judiciary Committee members about his role on matters such as the Clinton email investigation and former FBI Director James Comey's claims that Trump asked him for a loyalty pledge before firing him.
“You have all these FBI agents who have done nothing wrong, who are some of the finest people your will ever meet into a committee with 20 lawyers, members of congress sitting all around them. What’s the message that sends?" he said. "This person, Rybicki, is not alleged to have done anything wrong and he was brought in and it became a testy atmosphere."
4. Why is this not considered a potential death threat?
Page, August 2016 and said: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.
We implies more than one. A conspiracy? Who is we?
WHAT IS A THE DEFINITION OF A CONSPIRACY? "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful." and this guy was demoted to HUMAN RESOURCES by Christopher Wray?
Horowitz IG REPORT
|
5. FBI Chief Christopher Wray in speech on June 14 says the FBI will be better in the future because 12,000 + apply, but the selection rate is 5%.
"...just hired a whole new crowd of "honors interns"
Wray would be impressed by "honors interns" because he was a graduate of Yale.
Who is doing the hiring?
STRZOK?
At the Human Resources Branch. Where Strzok was reassigned by Christopher Wray after the texts were discovered.
Certainly not average Americans. For those he has great contempt.
Horowitz IG Report
|
So, What kind of individual gets hired by the Human Resources department and Peter Strzok?
AND...Why did Christopher Wray reassign Strzok to human resources?
|
| http://www.businessinsider.com/top-fbi-investigator-peter-strzok-steps-away-from-russia-probe-2017-8 |
SURE.
Or was it to enable Strzok to hire more of their like mind?
|
The Deep State Reproduces.
Notice that Strzok, "one of the Bureau's top experts on Russia" didn't think there was Russia collusion.
But, that didn't keep them from wanting to pursue advances in their careers. Which they thought the Russia investigation would turn out to be.
Wray says agents will be "trained" in what is already FBI policy. Why are they ALL not being prosecuted? The rules are there. The enforcement is not.
Why are heads not rolling as a consequence of the behavior there in the FBI with the Clinton Emails. The security of our country has been compromised by those who are charged with protecting us!
https://www.vox.com/2018/6/14/17455544/read-inspector-general-report-comey-clinton caption
I believe there are reasons why these people do not want their emails on government secured servers. Have they been subpoenaed? But even then, who will hold them accountable?
|
Contempt for Congress
6/22/2016 FBI LEADERSHIP ATTITUDE TOWARD CONGRESS
Page – Hi. Just leaving my meeting now. How we make law in this country is offensive and irresponsible.
8/09/2016 Strzok – I know it is. Its why I LOATHE congress. Can’t wait to hear the story.
Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!
According to the report, Page texted Strzok in August 2016 and said: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.
10/24/2016 THE TEAM? WHO IS REDACTED
Strzok –Wsj? Boy, that was fast. No word from [redacted] Should I "find" it and tell the team?
Page – No, I think not. Maybe he didn't get a chance, or [redacted] decided not to say anything until tomorrow.
Strzok – Not behind pay wall. I need to send
Strzok – The article is not behind a paywall We get several hours of warning about every other email, but not this, arguably more important than most...
Page – Jesus [redacted] Then fine. Send it to everyone you know. Or I can not tell you about it at all and you can just come across it given all the time you spend reading the Journal.
Page – What differ now does it make to send it to the team Sunday night vs monday morning?
Strzok – Or I can get it like I do every other article that hits my Google news alert. Seriously.
Page – Send me the Google alert.
Strzok – Give me a break. Go look at EVERY article I've sent the team. Count them. Then count every Godd*mn heads up I get from [redacted] but NOT this one. Them tell me I should sit on THIS one and let them hear from someone else. You're not being fair about this.
10/30/2016
Strzok – This is all Matt / Justice officials warned FBI that Comeys decision to update congress was not consistent with department policy - The Washington Post https://washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-officials-warned-fbi-that-comeys-decision-to-update-congress-was-not-consistent-with-department-policy(THIS ARTICLE IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE)
Page – Yeah. I saw it. Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus in the forthcoming CF article (?)
Strzok – Yep the whole tone is anti Bu (?). Just a tiny bit from is. And serves him right. He's gonna be pissed...
Not political?
NOT POLITICAL?
https://sharmanbursonramsey.blogspot.com/2018/06/analysis-of-evidence-of-political-bias.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would love to hear from you!