Madeleine Albright and Fascism

Does it bother you that someone can go into public service, create nothing, manufacture nothing, and catapult into the ranks of multi millionaire? Secrets, contacts, information are quite valuable. Just where are her loyalties?

Motivated by the above Facebook Post: ME: Odd isn't it? We are all good people, well-educated and thoughtful. And yet, I felt that the fascism would have come with Hillary. I support securing our borders like I do locking my doors at night. I cannot believe the venom that spews forth from a liberal media against a man who did nothing but run for president and people buy it! There was no collusion. Yet, after over a year of searching and collusion AGAINST the man, this goes on and on and on and on. We certainly see things differently! MY FRIEND: I listened to the interview - you can disagree with her, but to call it "venom spewing" is a mischaracterization. A well-educated, thoughtful response would be to point out specific points she made that you agree or disagree with. For example, fascist regimes forcibly suppress opposition, and Trump is waging a war on our free press and has threatened to lock up his political rivals. Those things are both demonstrably true - you can argue that you don't think he'll actually overstep his democratic bounds, or that if he does it's an acceptable outcome to you. We probably do see things differently, but can still have a reasonable discussion about it. But "he's not wrong, you just hate him" is not an argument, it's a temper tantrum. ----------------------------- 1.     Trump is not waging a war on the free press. The press chose sides. They voice the talking points of the Democrat Party. 98% of their coverage is negative, yet much good is happening. There IS NO COLLUSION. Unless it is that of the Deep State, the Democrat Party and the Major Media. Yet, that mantra continues.  2.     I did not say Albright was venom spewing, I said the Major Media is venom spewing, nasty talking and bullying!  3.     Hillary is a crook and should be jailed. Cecily (eldest daughter computer engineer that worked for the Navy at one time) would have been for less than what Hillary did. If she had just taken the hammer to one of her personal communication devices (and Hillary had MANY) she would have been in jail! Why does Hillary get to walk when she lied over and over and destroyed emails and devices that Congress subpoenaed? No person should be above the law! So now, why do I not respect Madeleine Albright’s conclusions regarding Trump? Albright is a part of a globalist cabal that wants to undermine our country and replace it with a North American Community without borders.

Madeleine Albright Friend on Facebook: conspiracy theory much? My response:  Conspiracies?
Organizations				Problem?
Born 1937 in Czechoslovakia, sent to the Prealpina Institut pour Jeunes Filles finishing school in Chexbres, on Lake Geneva in Switzerland.				Not a native born American. Has no natural loyalty to the United States.				See Also: http://www.southern-style.com/Education/conspiracy_of_the_left.html
Immigrated to the US in 1948 when she was 11 Attended Wellesley
Madeleine Albright is a Director on the Board of the Council of Foreign Relations.				The Council of Foreign Relations is a non-elected body of very powerful people with a globalist mindset. They believe in a world without borders. This particularly affects the US.				To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.
A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter." "Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. "Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway. The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards. The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system. Remember, these are NON ELECTED PEOPLE setting forth plans for OUR COUNTRY.  Of course, their plans did not come to pass as expected. However, if Hillary Clinton had been elected all of those plans would have come to fruition. That is why the Deep State is in such an uproar. God thwarted their intention bringing forth His man, not the one most "qualified" (in the world's eyes)  “There has never been a man or a woman—not me , not Bill, nobody—more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as president of the United States of America.” Barach Obama On July 15, 2009, Clinton spoke to the Washington DC satellite facility of the CFR where she stated: I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters. I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future." (Speech: Hillary Rodham ClintonSecretary of State, Washington, DC, July 15, 2009) Screen shot
Albright worked with  Zbigniew Kazimierz "Zbig" Brzezinski (Mika Brezinsky’s father)  on the National Security Council. Albright served in that position until the end of President Jimmy Carter's lone term.
Clinton appointed Albright to the position of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
As Secretary of State, Albright ignored requests for assistance from U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that were bombed in August 1998.  Prudence Bushnell, U.S. Ambassador to Kenya, repeatedly asked Washington for additional security at the embassy in Nairobi, including in an April 1998 letter directly to Albright						Look below at the investment in  Africa with Soros. Could that  Have influenced Albright’s  reaction /or non-reaction to the  appeals from Bushnell? I cannot help but wonder, if her net worth is only $10 million, how she was able to invest with Rothschild and Soros in a $350 million investment vehicle mentioned below.
She is a co-investor with Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, and George Soros in a $350 million investment vehicle called Helios Towers Africa, which intends to buy or build thousands of mobile phone towers in Africa.				George Soros funds Antifa and other disruptive organizations to stir up trouble to achieve his goals. Madeline Albright is his “business partner”? The Rothschilds have long been known as globalists.		Here Soros refers to his time as a Nazi confiscating the property of fellow Jews.
Albright represented the U.S. at the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong on July 1, 1997. She along with the British contingents boycotted the swearing-in ceremony of the Chinese-appointed Hong Kong Legislative Council, which replaced the elected one.				And she claims to support “democracy”
Many speculated that Albright might pursue a career in Czech politics. Václav Havel, Czech President from February 1993 to February 2003, talked openly about the possibility of Albright succeeding him				Apparently her dedication and loyalty to the United States is questionable.
Based in Qatar, Albright serves on the International Advisory Committee  Brookings Doha Center that undertakes independent, policy-oriented research on socioeconomic and geopolitical issues facing Muslim-majority states and communities, including relations with the United States.[93] The center was formally inaugurated by H. E. Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al-Thani, Prime Minister and minister of foreign affairs of Qatar, on February 17, 2008. Salman Shaikh is the Center's Director.				Quatar provides support to terrorist groups.
She founded the Albright Group, an international strategy consulting firm based in Washington, D.C				Notice Albright  sells her services to foreign nations to promote their goals in Washington.
In October 2012, Albright appeared in a video on the official Twitter feed for the Democrat party, responding to then-GOP candidate Mitt Romney's assertion that Russia was the "number-one geopolitical foe" of the United States. According to Albright, Romney's statement was proof that he had "little understanding of what was actually going on in the 21st Century [and] he is not up to date and that is a very dangerous aspect [of his candidacy]"				Mocked Mitt Romney for thinking that Russia was the “number one geopolitical foe.” I think she sings a different tune today.
Albright is chair of the advisory council for The Hague Institute for Global Justice, which was founded in 2011 in The Hague				Look at how these non-elected, elitists (who take money from foreign nations) presume to make policy decisions for the rest of us.
Honorary Chair for the World Justice Project.[105]The World Justice Projectworks to lead a global, multidisciplinary effort to strengthen the Rule of Law for the development of communities of opportunity and equity.				Once again, a non-elected official presumes to act as judge and jury for communities throughout the world!
Information above mostly from Wikipedia and review of Albright’s book .




So, just who, liberals or conservatives, are using violence to control thought and silence the other side? Conservatives are not a part of Antifa. Conservatives do not advocate thought police. I submit that fixing elections, using violence to silence free speech, and refusing to accept that laws apply to ALL OF us are much closer to Fascism than anything happening in society today!


On why parts of the world are moving toward authoritarianism

“And then the other part of this, which I think is essential, is there is some leader at the top who takes advantage of these divisions and, in fact, exacerbates them so that the societies are more and more divided and wrangled and looking for scapegoats, which is where the immigrants come in. But mostly, this is something that's created internally by massive changes in society and some of them, due to technology.”

The tech companies are of admitted liberal inclination. How ironic it is that Albright could say this with a straight face when this is EXACTLY what Hillary has done! and Albright and the Democrat Party with its identity politics continues to do!

Unlike Albright who blames Trump for the move toward authoritarianism, I see the authoritarianism within the Deep State, the FBI abuse of power, and the violent imposition of fear tactics against Conservatives by Antifa. They look down upon those who voted for Trump and dismiss their concerns as unintellectual.

Look at Venezuela today! One man, one vote, one time! Thankfully we are a Republic!

On President Trump's "America First" ideology and criticism of NATO

"I see it as the most unbelievable step backwards, because I do believe that the United States is stronger when we have friends and allies to deal with the various issues. ... As a European who has spent her life in the United States, I see the Euro-Atlantic alliance as one of the most important bulwarks of our society, so seeing this go on, I find appalling. And what is the issue — again, it's this lack of understanding of what this alliance is about. ..."

Albright admits that she sees the US role in the world through the prism of a European. She objects to Trump’s “America First” ideology because she sees the world through a globalist’s perspective. Globalists see the US as the cash cow to fund their agendas throughout the world through NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) like the United Nations. And, of course, they handle the money, award the winners and destroy the losers. 

On her belief that President Trump is "anti-democratic"

Thank God we are not a pure democracy. A pure democracy is two wolves and a chicken voting for what’s for dinner. 

Taking the Hunger Games as a metaphor for what could happen, Madeline Albright (including BFF Hillary Clinton) and her associates would be the rulers in Panem. Once they disarm the rest of us, we would be like the Districts of the Hunger Games that work to support the lifestyle of the leaders in Panem. We are not bright enough to understand what the world really requires. 

And that my friends would make us slaves. 

So, when the friend challenged me on Facebook writing: 

I listened to the interview - you can disagree with her, but to call it "venom spewing" is a mischaracterization. A well-educated, thoughtful response would be to point out specific points she made that you agree or disagree with. 

For example, fascist regimes forcibly suppress opposition, and Trump is waging a war on our free press and has threatened to lock up his political rivals. 

---------------------------------------

The points above articulate my concerns with Madeleine Albright. 

It is my belief that the Fascist regime that continues to undermine the duly elected president of the United States is the Deep State using its power to attempt to forcibly suppress opposition. This group of people has determined that they will control policy regardless of the will of the people. Read the emails Peter Strozk (FBI)  and Lisa Page (Justice Department) see if you think that might be considered a conspiracy to attempt a coup. 

While the accusation of Russian collusion was leveled at Trump, the actual collusion was by Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party that first colluded to keep Bernie Sanders from becoming the Democratic candidate for President and then to undermine Trump through a salacious and fallacious document funded by Hillary and the Democrat Party that was then "leaked to Major Media" (suspected leaker? John Brennan, former FBI chief) as well as being used to procure FISA approval to wiretapping American citizens. Lies and deceit are their methodology.

 I repeat:

1.    Trump is not waging a war on the free press. The press chose sides. They voice the talking points of the Democrat Party. 98% of their coverage is negative, yet much good is happening. There IS NO COLLUSION on Trump's part. Yet, that mantra continues as a part of the RESIST movement. Just what are they resisting?  

2.    I did not say Albright was venom spewing, I said the Major Media is venom spewing, nasty talking and bullying! 

3.    Hillary is a crook and should be jailed. Cecily (eldest daughter computer engineer that worked for the Navy at one time) would have been jailed for much less than what Hillary did. If she had just taken the hammer to just one of her personal communication devices (and Hillary had MANY that were destroyed) she would have been in jail! Why does Hillary get to walk when she lied over and over and destroyed emails and devices that Congress subpoenaed? 

Bernie Sanders didn’t have a chance! Clinton rigged the primaries. As Donna Brazille writes:

The Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC was also required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

I would submit that it is "antidemocratic" to undermine the Democrat primaries rigging the election so that only she would win. And since the election she immediately started the lies regarding collusion TO DETRACT FROM HER OWN RUSSIAN COLLUSION SELLING 20% OF SCARCE AMERICAN URANIUM TO THE RUSSIANS AND FABRICATING A DOCUMENT, PUSHING IT TO THE MEDIA AND FBI TO USE AS "EVIDENCE" FOR FISA WARRANTS TO TAP TRUMP AND ASSOCIATES. These are third world tactics and she and her associates are as guilty as sin. 

Albright said, “ There's a special place in hell for women who don't help each other!”

Many women looked at Hillary's record and concluded no person should be above the law! They chose not to be corralled like a bunch of sheep to think only feminist approved thoughts.  So, I also resent Albright's lumping all women into a group of mind controlled robots. Personally, I think there is a special place in hell for liars and cheats regardless of their gender and especially for those who rise to power denying others justice under our laws. 

Why do I not respect Madeleine Albright’s conclusions regarding Trump? Albright is a part of a globalist cabal that wants to undermine our country and replace it with a North American Community without borders. The organizations to which she belongs support my conclusions. Her support of Hillary Clinton reaffirms that evaluation. 

She considers her European roots primary. My roots go back to the 1600s. Native American roots are even further back. I am appalled with this disrespect for the most wonderful, generous country in the world and its duly elected president. I am a Deplorable who sees the good in this country and I want my grandchildren retain the right to see the positive of our land.